A work in progress edited by
Department of Adult Education, Community Development and Counselling Psychology,
The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto (OISE/UT)
1938, the Royal Commission Report on Penal Reform in Canada, also known as the
Archambault Report, was tabled. This report is widely recognized as Canada’s
pre-eminent document on prison reform, because it represented a complete change
in focus towards the rehabilitative role of prisons, away from the historical
trend of retributive punishment.
comprehend the significance of this report, it is important to examine the
social and historical context into which the report was introduced.
At the turn of the 20th century, developments in the field of
psychology supported the call for reforms to the parole system in Canada, a
system that was in effect, non-existent. Several of those psychological studies
argued that reformative treatments could positively affect the brain in those
individuals who participated in criminal behaviour, and restore within them the
capacity for non-criminal behaviour.
the pressure towards rehabilitation was soon lost on Canadian society as war
veterans returned to Canada following a brutal experience in World War I.
Rehabilitation became irrelevant in light of the slaughter overseas. Credibility
in science diminished. The crime rate on Canadian soil increased substantially
in the years following the war. For those in Canadian prisons, conditions became
the Depression years of the 1930s, a new situation arose. The crime rate was
still high, but prison space became limited and there were minimal government
funds available to build new prisons. Proponents of penal reform, such as Agnes
McPhail, were now being heard out of necessity. Canadian prisons no longer
operated in isolation from the rest of society, and management practices and
punishment methods were now scrutinized by the public. It was in this context
that in 1934, Mr. Justice Joseph Archambault was appointed by the federal
government to lead an investigation on prisons, and by 1936 the Royal Commission
on Penal Reform in Canada was created.
focus of the Archambault Report was a call for “strict but humane discipline
and the reformation and rehabilitation of prisoners.” In many ways, “the
Archambault Report reflected a society that had become less concerned with
retribution and more with rehabilitation.” (Correctional Services Canada,
Archambault Report represented a significant change in the direction of penal
history and the treatment of prisoners. The Report rejected the Auburn System, a
model of incarceration developed in the United States in the early 1800s, which
called for prisoner isolation and exhaustive manual labour conducted in silence.
Rather, Joseph Archambault proposed that the focus should be placed on the
readaptation of the inmates, with the hiring of specialists and the creation of
adult education programs.
firmly believed that if prisoners were provided with the opportunity for
rehabilitation, the rate of recidivism would decline substantially. Under the
system in place at that time, Archambault did not feel that prisoners were
provided with an opportunity to reform their behaviour while incarcerated, nor
were they supported in their efforts to seek employment following their release
the recommendations of the Archambault Report were not immediately implemented
due the onset of World War II, the report inspired numerous reforms introduced
to the Canadian penal system in the 1940s. The primary objective of the reforms
was to “focus on treatment within the walls. Prisons began to hire teachers
and psychologists and developed training programs”. (Government of Canada,
National Parole Board)
Archambault Report marked a defining moment in Canadian penal history, and in
outlining the role of adult education in it. For the first time, adult educators
were invited into the prison system to facilitate the education and
rehabilitation of prisoners. No longer was sentencing viewed merely as
retribution; prisons were to be the grounds of reformation and rehabilitation.
The Archambault Report paved the way for adult educators to take an active role
in nurturing the learning of prisoners and in helping them to prepare
effectively for a healthy re-entry into society.
Andre (2000). Punishment, Imprisonment and Reform in Canada, from New France to
the Present. Canadian Historical Association: 2000
World Corporal Punishment Research. www.corpun.com
(Accessed November 5, 2002)
of Canada. Correctional Services. www.csc-scc.gc.ca
(Accessed November 5, 2002)
Government of Canada. National Parole Board. www.npb-cnic.gc.ca (Accessed November 5, 2002)
Prepared by Meghan Seybold (OISE/UT)
Citation: Author (2002). Title. In Daniel Schugurensky (Ed.), History of Education: Selected Moments of the 20th Century [online]. Available: http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~daniel_schugurensky/assignment1/ (date accessed).
DS Home Page Back to Index Suggest or Submit a Moment
Website © 1996-2002 Daniel Schugurensky. All Rights Reserved.
Design and maintenance by LMS.
Last updated on December 15, 2002.